At 05:15 PM 6/20/01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On 20 Jun 2001, at 15:16, David Honig wrote:
>
>> >do a cryptographic authentication procedure with the drive. Code to
>> >do this is covered under "circumvention device" in the DMCA according
>> >to the 2600-MPAA case.
>>
>> Not if you have lawfully paid for the content.
>>
>have you filed an amicus curiae brief explaining this? If so, how
>come the case isn't over yet, with the 2600 people victorious.
You can lead a judge to water but you can't make him think.
