Pl see TRAI recommendation on broadcasting below. 

 

To quote. “The broadcasting needs of the State governments, if any, should
be met adequately by Prasar Bharati, TRAI said.”

 

This is significant in light of state governments trying to appropriate
community radio for their ‘broadcasting needs’. Though I’d like to see some
plurality even in state sponsored public interest broadcast. But the lines
should be clearly drawn, vis-à-vis community radio.

 

I think the CR Forum should invite TRAI’s attention to this issue. 

 

 Parminder 

 

 

 

http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Nov142008/national20081113100683.asp

 

 

If Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) were to have its way, there
won’t be any political channels or religious channels in the country within
a couple of years. State governments and their subsidiary bodies, political
and religious associations can’t broadcast any channel or involve in
distribution.

 

TRAI in a reply to the government’s question, whether entering of such
bodies is in the interest of broadcasting sector and the larger public good,
made some recommendations on Wednesday.

 

The broadcasting needs of the State governments, if any, should be met
adequately by Prasar Bharati, TRAI said. It also recommended that the
political parties shouldn’t be allowed to broadcast any channel. It however
added that, in the spirit of democracy, to keep the information flow
channels can provide “reasonable access” to recognised political parties
during the run up to the polls for both the Houses. The Election Commission
can be requested by the government to provide basic guidelines for this.

 

TRAI has suggested that certain rules regarding Public Service Broadcasting
(PSB) should be imposed on private channels under which the broadcasters
have to telecast programmes with public service content.

 

Such content could be provided by NGOs, social action groups and be overseen
by a regulatory body set up exclusively for the purpose of checking the PSB
obligation. It further suggested that a Public Service Broadcasting
Obligation Fund could be created to fund such programmes.

 

Religious bodies should not be allowed to have their own broadcasting
stations and said such a rule would be in tune with the secular nature of
our constitution. The channels, however, could be allowed to telecast
programmes with religious content. In cases where already such permission
has been given to a religious body, TRAI suggested that they should be
phased out in three, four years.

 

There are about 35 religious channels in the country. There are five
channels affiliated to political parties, mostly in the South, including the
Congress, CPM, DMK and AIADMK.

 

 

http://www.deccanherald.com/Content/Nov142008/national20081113100683.asp

 

 

_______________________________________________
cr-india mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.sarai.net/mailman/listinfo/cr-india

Reply via email to