On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 12:49 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 11:58 AM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
> >> Here's another attempt at solving the bug. It adds a flag to
> >> add_basics_to_problem_data indicating whether or not we are
> >> interested about
> >> data from current process. Additionally, it adds optional argument to
> >> createAlertSignature, which can be used by sealert to pass the
> >> executable
> >> directly.
> >>
> >
> > ok, patch seems good. what I would like to see is only addition of an 
> > optional
> > argument to *createAlertSignature* and let setroubleshoot and anaconda fix 
> > this issue.
> 
> - Vrata is working on a patch for python-meh and abrt-server to do 
> exactly this..
Am I?
I am working on modifying abrt-server in a way that it will be possible
for python-meh to use the abrt.socket for communication.

> 
> Vrato, what's the news?
I believe it's almost done, but since I have some hurrying Anaconda
stuff now, these things are going slowly. I will send my patches for a
review this week. Once they are approved I'll do the modifications in
python-meh.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jirka

-- 
Vratislav Podzimek

Anaconda Rider | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic

Reply via email to