Castor Fu wrote: > > Would it be possible to modify the license for crash so extensions > would not be subject to the GPL? Our developers create extensions > which use our proprietary source code, and while they are most > useful in-house, it'd be nice to be able to ship them to customers. >
I am not a lawyer, nor am I an open source zealot, but the crash utility is subject to the GPL due to the embedded gdb module. Given that any extension would be in all probability require a gdb service, how could you work around that? Dave > > We're certainly interested in contributing back generically useful code, > but this would be a 'nice to have'. > > I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not sure how to modify the license, but I could > ask people here for help if this seems reasonable. > > -castor > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility >
-- Crash-utility mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
