On 01/17/07 17:46, Bernhard Walle wrote:

> I think it's too specific (the part that detemines the position of the
> load daddress), but at least I think the LKCD IA64 maintainer should
> take a look at the problem that CONFIG_NR_CPU in kernel must be equal
> to the CPU define in crash and find a solution for this. 

I agree, the patch is to specific. I also like the NR_CPU calculation.
Bernhard, can you workup a patch that just does the NR_CPU calc and
skips the header moves?

Thanks,

Troy

--
Crash-utility mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility

Reply via email to