----- Original Message -----
> Hello Dave,
>
> Glad to hear the capability is desirable. I will start to implement this
> soon.
>
> >> What if I change struct sub-command to this:
> >>
> >> 1. it can refer to anonymous members (e.g., page._mapcount)
> >> 2. it can refer to submembers(e.g., page._count.counter)
One other suggestion -- I believe it should not be necessary to
support the "page._count.counter" format, because you can get
the data by using the container name. Taking the "_count.counter"
example:
crash> p ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000200)._count.counter
$10 = 0
crash> p ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000200)._count
$11 = {
counter = 0
}
crash>
So using "page._count" should suffice.
Thanks,
Dave
--
Crash-utility mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility