----- Original Message -----
> Hello Dave,
> 
> Glad to hear the capability is desirable. I will start to implement this
> soon.
> 

> >> What if I change struct sub-command to this:
> >>
> >> 1. it can refer to anonymous members (e.g., page._mapcount)
> >> 2. it can refer to submembers(e.g., page._count.counter)

One other suggestion -- I believe it should not be necessary to
support the "page._count.counter" format, because you can get
the data by using the container name.  Taking the "_count.counter"
example:

  crash> p ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000200)._count.counter
  $10 = 0
  crash> p ((struct page *)0xffffea0000000200)._count
  $11 = {
    counter = 0
  }
  crash>

So using "page._count" should suffice.

Thanks,
  Dave

--
Crash-utility mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility

Reply via email to