----- Original Message -----
> Yes, I did miss the second question, sorry about that.
> 
> Yes, I agree it's best not to disturb the 32-bit behavior that has
> been working.  I'd prefer not to restrict it to instances where
> --kaslr was specified on the command line because I'd like to submit a
> patch in the near future that auto-detects the aslr offset and makes
> the argument unnecessary.  How about a check for
> MACHINE_TYPE("X86_64") for this behavior while MACHINE_TYPE("X86")
> gets existing behavior?

Works for me...

Thanks,
  Dave

--
Crash-utility mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility

Reply via email to