Hi Takahiro,
To address my concerns about your patch, I added a few additional changes and
attached
it to this email. The changes are:
(1) Prevent the stack dump "below" the #0 level. Yes, the stack data region is
contained within
the incoming frame parameters, but it's ugly and we really don't care to
see what's before
the #0 crash_kexec and crash_save_cpu #0 frames.
(2) Fill in the missing stack dump at the top of the process stack, up to, but
not including
the user-space exception frame.
(3) Instead of showing the fp of 0 in the top-most frame's stack address, fill
it in with the
address of the user-space exception frame.
Note that there is no dump of the stack containing the user-space exception
frame, but the
register dump itself should suffice.
If you can live with the display, I'll clean up the patch, and maybe add the
stack-layout diagram
from your last post into a comment. It was quite helpful, especially in
comparison to the
x86_64 model, which is what I was mistakenly using as a guide.
Thanks,
Dave
diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c
index 86ec348..3b29ef4 100644
--- a/arm64.c
+++ b/arm64.c
@@ -1407,13 +1407,14 @@ arm64_print_stackframe_entry(struct bt_info *bt, int level, struct arm64_stackfr
value_to_symstr(frame->pc, buf, bt->radix);
}
- if (bt->flags & BT_FULL) {
- arm64_display_full_frame(bt, frame->sp);
- bt->frameptr = frame->sp;
+ if ((bt->flags & BT_FULL) && level) {
+ arm64_display_full_frame(bt, frame->fp);
+ bt->frameptr = frame->fp;
}
fprintf(ofp, "%s#%d [%8lx] %s at %lx", level < 10 ? " " : "", level,
- frame->sp, name_plus_offset ? name_plus_offset : name, frame->pc);
+// frame->fp, name_plus_offset ? name_plus_offset : name, frame->pc);
+ frame->fp ? frame->fp : bt->stacktop - USER_EFRAME_OFFSET, name_plus_offset ? name_plus_offset : name, frame->pc);
if (BT_REFERENCE_CHECK(bt))
arm64_do_bt_reference_check(bt, frame->pc, name);
@@ -1447,8 +1448,12 @@ arm64_display_full_frame(struct bt_info *bt, ulong sp)
if (bt->frameptr == sp)
return;
- if (!INSTACK(sp, bt) || !INSTACK(bt->frameptr, bt))
- return;
+ if (!INSTACK(sp, bt) || !INSTACK(bt->frameptr, bt)) {
+ if (sp == 0)
+ sp = bt->stacktop - USER_EFRAME_OFFSET;
+ else
+ return;
+ }
words = (sp - bt->frameptr) / sizeof(ulong);
@@ -1471,12 +1476,10 @@ arm64_unwind_frame(struct bt_info *bt, struct arm64_stackframe *frame)
{
unsigned long high, low, fp;
unsigned long stack_mask;
- unsigned long irq_stack_ptr, orig_sp, sp_in;
+ unsigned long irq_stack_ptr, orig_sp;
struct arm64_pt_regs *ptregs;
struct machine_specific *ms;
- sp_in = frame->sp;
-
stack_mask = (unsigned long)(ARM64_STACK_SIZE) - 1;
fp = frame->fp;
@@ -1513,7 +1516,7 @@ arm64_unwind_frame(struct bt_info *bt, struct arm64_stackframe *frame)
ptregs = (struct arm64_pt_regs *)&bt->stackbuf[(ulong)(STACK_OFFSET_TYPE(orig_sp))];
frame->sp = orig_sp;
frame->pc = ptregs->pc;
- bt->bptr = sp_in;
+ bt->bptr = fp;
if (CRASHDEBUG(1))
error(INFO,
"arm64_unwind_frame: switch stacks: fp: %lx sp: %lx pc: %lx\n",
@@ -1904,8 +1907,10 @@ arm64_print_exception_frame(struct bt_info *bt, ulong pt_regs, int mode, FILE *o
ulong LR, SP, offset;
char buf[BUFSIZE];
+#if 0 /* FIXME? */
if (bt->flags & BT_FULL)
arm64_display_full_frame(bt, pt_regs);
+#endif
if (CRASHDEBUG(1))
fprintf(ofp, "pt_regs: %lx\n", pt_regs);
--
Crash-utility mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
