On 29 June 2016 at 04:35, Dave Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Takahiro, > > Without this patch -- aside from in-kernel exception frames not > getting found and displayed -- does everything else work OK?
All what I can say is that this is the only issue that I have noticed so far on VHE-enabled system. So the "subject" may be overstated. Thanks, -Takahiro AKASHI > Dave > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > On VHE-enabled system, the kernel runs in EL2. > > > > Signed-off-by: AKASHI Takahiro <[email protected]> > > --- > > arm64.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arm64.c b/arm64.c > > index bad36aa..b9fa14d 100644 > > --- a/arm64.c > > +++ b/arm64.c > > @@ -1414,6 +1414,8 @@ arm64_is_kernel_exception_frame(struct bt_info *bt, > > ulong stkptr) > > { > > case PSR_MODE_EL1t: > > case PSR_MODE_EL1h: > > + case PSR_MODE_EL2t: > > + case PSR_MODE_EL2h: > > return TRUE; > > } > > } > > -- > > 2.9.0 > > > > -- > > Crash-utility mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility > > > > -- > Crash-utility mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
-- Crash-utility mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
