Since linux-next commit fe1e19081321 ("mm: Split slab into its own type"),
the struct slab is used for both SLAB and SLUB. Therefore, don't depend
on the non-presence of the struct slab to decide whether SLAB implementation
should be chosen and use the member variable "cpu_slab" of the struct
kmem_cache instead, it should be present only in SLUB.Signed-off-by: Alexander Egorenkov <[email protected]> --- memory.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/memory.c b/memory.c index 86c02c132890..5af45fd7d834 100644 --- a/memory.c +++ b/memory.c @@ -576,7 +576,8 @@ vm_init(void) STRUCT_SIZE_INIT(cpucache_s, "cpucache_s"); } else if (!VALID_STRUCT(kmem_slab_s) && - !VALID_STRUCT(slab_s) && + !VALID_STRUCT(slab_s) && + !MEMBER_EXISTS("kmem_cache", "cpu_slab") && (VALID_STRUCT(slab) || (vt->flags & SLAB_OVERLOAD_PAGE))) { vt->flags |= PERCPU_KMALLOC_V2; -- 2.31.1 -- Crash-utility mailing list [email protected] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility
