On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 1:24 PM HAGIO KAZUHITO(萩尾 一仁) <k-hagio...@nec.com> wrote:
> On 2023/07/27 21:28, Ming Wang wrote: > > This patch are for Crash-utility tool, it make crash tool support on > > loongarch64 architecture and the common commands(bt, p, rd, mod, log, > set, > > dis, and so on). > > > > The upstream GDB code supports the loongarch64 architecture from version > 13.1. > > See: https://sourceware.org/gdb/download/ANNOUNCEMENT > > But Crash-utility depends on gdb-10.2, gdb-10.2 do NOT supported > loongarch64. > > So we need a patch(gdb-10.2-loongarch.patch) to support it. I don't have > a better > > way to deal with this problem at the moment. > > I have not seen the patch yet, but personally I don't have a plan to > rebase the embedded gdb for now and a rebase work is so hard, so if a > gdb patch works well for LoongArch, probably I will be able to accept it. > > Lianbo, do you have any plan to rebase the embedded gdb? > Sorry for the late reply, Kazu and Ming Wang. For the time being, I don't have any plans to rebase the latest gdb for the crash-utility. And having a gdb patch for the LoongArch64 should be good. I will put the patch in my queue. Thanks. Lianbo > Usually we don't maintain two crash versions, so if we rebase it now, > RHEL9 crash will need a lot of backport efforts or major version > rebasing. I think maybe it's too early. > > Thanks, > Kazu >
-- Crash-utility mailing list Crash-utility@redhat.com https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/crash-utility Contribution Guidelines: https://github.com/crash-utility/crash/wiki
