URL for this article is www.emperors-clothes.com/news/cialectures.htm

Is the Balkans the new Latin America?
Bulgarian paper says: 'CIA is tutoring Serbian group, Otpor' 

>From the Bulgarian newspaper, "The Monitor"
Translated by Blagovesta Doncheva
(Posted 9-8-00)

Commentary by Jared Israel follows "The Monitor' article.

www.tenc.net 
[Emperor's Clothes]

Introductory note: The following article from the Bulgarian newspaper, 'The 
Monitor' raises serious charges about the Yugoslav 'opposition' group, Otpor. 
My commentary, 'Otpor: the Message Ain't hidden Any more', follows 'The 
Monitor' piece. Please let me make two things clear. 

First, I think Yugoslavia, like every country, needs a viable opposition. If 
only one view is heard, or even if only one view is credible, decay sets in. 
Second, I do not think Americans should meddle in Yugoslavia's internal 
affairs. I do not think Americans should meddle in the internal affairs of 
any other country. Period.

But the US is already meddling; that presents a problem. The meddling must be 
addressed by US citizens even though it involves a sort of interference in 
Yugoslavia's internal affairs.

The US has poured vast sums into destabilizing Yugoslavia. No one knows 
exactly how much; surely it is over $100,000,000. (1) The intent is to 
corrupt. How can this help but distort the Yugoslav political process, 
especially since draconian sanctions, imposed on Serbia by the US, have 
greatly multiplied the value of US dollars. Absent this bribe money and an 
honest opposition could develop. There could be real debate. The Yugoslavs 
would gain. But in the presence of vast sums, dangled to lure people, 
especially young people, to treason, how can there be productive political 
struggle? This is a crime, no less than NATO's 78 day bombing campaign.
 -- Jared Israel

>From 'The Monitor' 

"I hate to be first!" This Bruce Willis line applies to everything we at 'The 
Monitor' have said about the US presence in the Balkans in general and in 
Bulgaria in particular. 

Several times we've published the truth about US intrusions. We've noticed 
that following our exposes, events seem to proceed in a prediabt4le fashion.. 

In the first stage those in power deny that anything is happening. 

In the second stage they make a few admissions, though painfully. 

This was the case when the Yankees demanded bases in Bulgaria. While one 
member of the ruling "elite" denied it, another had already admitted it. In 
the end everything we said proved true.. 

It was the same with the CIA center in Sofia, whose existence we exposed last 
year. And it was the same in with the meetings between Yugoslav 'opposition' 
activists and Ambassador Miles and his covert agents, a meeting that took 
place last year, in the Sheraton Hotel in Sofia. 

"No such thing happened," Ambassador Miles said at first. He was of course 
lying. Later he had to admit he had shared a meal with Yugoslavs. 

Now our warning, announced while US CIA head Tenet was still in Sofia, has 
proved true as well. 

All the pretentious analyses about the reasons for the CIA boss's visit are 
reduced to (and exposed as) just another brutal order to today's Bulgarian 
rulers - to keep selling our country's sovereignty, providing another 
country's spy organizations with a center for operations against a 
neighboring country. Yugoslavia. 

The latest admission comes in the BBC report that a ten-day special course 
starts in Sofia today (August 28). 

In that course U.S. spies will lecture and instruct Serb activists from the 
group "Otpor." 

Lecture and instruct in what? 

Will they tell them how to create the appearance of a mass movement by 
banging pots and pans? A CIA trade mark, accompanying its coups, this was 
used in Brazil in 1961, in Chili in 1973, and in Bulgaria in 1990. Or, maybe, 
the Serbs will be taught how to destroy and set fire to a Parliament 
building? That was tried in Sofia in 1997. There are many ways to destabilize 
a Balkan country, but the specialists from beyond the ocean don't rack their 
brains uselessly or rely on imagination. They strictly follow tried and true 
methods - it's all modular, plug and play.. If it worked before, use it 
again. This style of work is a matter of principle with the Great Spies. 

It seems that for the U.S.A., Latin America has moved to the Balkans. And 
Bulgaria's ruling men and women are now no more than puppets of the same type 
as those colonels whom Washington used with such gusto when they colonized 
south of the Panama Canal. The sad thing is that both our rulers and we 
ourselves know full well what lies in store for those who serve as puppets 
and go-betweens in the US elite's dirty game... 

-- 'The Monitor' 8-28-00

Otpor: The Message Isn't Hidden Anymore

According to the Bulgarian nesspaper, 'Monitor', the Yugoslav group, Otpor, 
is being trained by the CIA to provoke and destabilize Yugoslavia.

What exactly is this Otpor? What are its beliefs? Does it have a program?

Otpor lists some demands on its website: "Free University; Free elections; 
Free media." These demands suggest Otpor opposes the Yugoslav status quo. But 
what does Otpor stand for?

Clicking on "Who we are" doesn't help. Other than attacking Slobodan 
Milosevich, the closest Otpor gets to a position statement is a discussion of 
its cartoon-like symbol: 

"The symbol of the student RESISTANCE is the clenched fist.. The fist itself 
is conceived as the symbol of individual initiative, that the time and energy 
of every single person should be invested to bring about change. This symbol 
of personal courage was born with the first public manifestation of 
RESISTANCE, a leaflet called "Bite the System". (our emphasis)

Where's the beef?

Aside from a vaguely free market-ish reference to "every single person" being 
"invested to bring about change" - what's the program? 

The stenciled image of a clenched fist was first produced during the Harvard 
Strike of 1969. I was a student activist at Harvard. The fist was drawn by 
kids at the Graduate School of Design. It appeared on posters with a very 
clear list of demands: Strike to get the Reserve Officer Training Corps off 
campus; Strike to stop the expansion of the Harvard Medical School into 
working class neighborhoods. (Harvard was evicting people from their homes.) 
And so on. You could agree or disagree, but there was no ambiguity.

Does Otpor merely posture, imitating symbols of student protests past? Or is 
there a hidden message?

Sometimes you can find the message hidden in the details. Otpor's outlook 
emerges clearly when it describes its actions. The title of one of their web 
pages is: "Hey, Chief, when are you going to Hague?" 

'The Hague' refers to the War Crimes Tribunal for Yugoslavia. The 'Chief', of 
course, is Milosevich.

Here's the text:

"On August 8th, 1999 OTPOR! activists in Nis held a birthday 'celebration' 
for president Slobodan Milosevic. The protesters (over 2000 citizens of Nis) 
had a chance to write down their birthday wishes on a big birthday-card 
located next to the main stage. One of the OTPOR! Activists received presents 
on behalf of president Milosevic. The presents included a one way ticket to 
Hague, prisoner cover-all's, books written by Mira Markovic (his wife), 
handcuffs, and a big red-star shaped cake. The cake was later given away to 
the protestors."

Ahh, now we're getting somewhere. 

The indictment of Slobodan Milosevic by the ICTY (War Crimes Tribunal) is 
based on claims that Yugoslav forces under his command committed war crimes 
in Kosovo. This of course is the heart of NATO's justification for the 78 
bombing campaign against Yugoslavia. We have argued that these accusations 
are lies. We awaiting refutation. We have asked one of the accusers, Noam 
Chomsky, to provide evidence. We grow older; we wait.

We at Emperor's Clothes have studied the evidence and we conclude: it was 
NATO, not Yugoslavia which committed war crimes in Kosovo. We conclude: the 
ICTY's purpose is to blame the victim and thereby blunt opposition to NATO. 
If someone can prove we're wrong, we'll drop the issue. We defend truth, not 
war criminals.

It is impossible (or at least grotesquely unprincipled) to support the 
indictment of Milosevich unless one also supports the justification for that 
indictment, NATO's claim that Serbian forces deliberately murdered civilians 
in the village of Racak and elsewhere.

Indeed, the indictment was brought in order to provide the Western mass media 
with talking points to justify the attack on Yugoslavia.

Given Otpor's support for the War Crimes Tribunal, which is truly hated in 
Yugoslavia for its Star Chamber methods, (2) it's clearly anti-Serb purpose 
and its open control by and dependence on NATO (3), how much support could 
Otpor have in Yugoslavia?

I would suggest Otpor has precious little support inside Yugoslavia, but it 
is looked at with misty eyes by some people in the Serbian Diaspora, who are 
torn between opposition to NATO and to Milosevich, and also by certain 
non-Serbs, such as the editors of Z magazine, who profess opposition to NATO 
policy while arguing that Yugoslavia is guilty of war crimes.

Otpor appeals to these rather different groups precisely because it combines 
symbols of rebellion with vagueness of demands and ambiguity about who is 
guilty in Yugoslavia - the West and its proxy forces or "the Milosevich 
regime". 

By the way, why is the Yugoslav government more of a 'regime' than any other 
government? Yugoslav political life certainly allows a greater divergence of 
opinion than, for example, the US where neither of the two main candidates 
for President seems to be aware that the US bombed a sovereign country for 78 
days, or that the US is sponsoring the slaughter of civilians in Colombia. 
What major newspaper in the US has allowed the antiwar opposition to publish 
its side? Indeed, the percentage of Yugoslavs who voted for the different 
parties in Yugoslavia's governing coalition is probably as high as or higher 
than the percentage of US voters who vote for anyone in US presidential 
elections. But nobody talks about 'the Clinton regime' do they?

Getting back to Otpor, what kind of people would help the bombers of their 
country divert blame to their country's leaders and people? Because clearly, 
if Milosevich is a new Hitler, as Mr. Clinton wants us to believe, then 
wouldn't that make the Serbs the new Nazis? What is the word for someone who 
betrays his own people while they are under attack?

Perhaps the fact that the CIA is apparently training Otpor in Sofia will 
clarify things for people who are fooled by Otpor's image. Hopefully they 
will realize that Otpor's purpose is to take provocative actions in concert 
with US covert agents inside and outside Yugoslavia, especially around the 
upcoming elections. All the better if this forces the Yugoslav government to 
crack down. Such a crackdown, no matter if justified, could be portrayed by 
the Western media as proof that "the Milosevich regime" is dictatorial. The 
aim: to weaken antiwar feeling among ordinary people and to confuse some 
members of the Serbian Diaspora and some non-Serbs in the antiwar movement. 
The intended effect: toprevent organized opposition to NATO attacks on 
Yugoslavia. 

It is most important that the antiwar movement expose this game. The CIA is 
apparently once more illegally meddling in Yugoslavia's internal affairs. 
These misguided young people are being used as a foil.

Or perhaps they are being used as a decoy. Maybe the CIA is training Otpor to 
be a good, wooden decoy, constructed to ambush a duck.

Maybe the hunter is NATO. Let's expose the trap.

- Jared Israel, 9-8-00

Further reading:

(1) On July 29, 1999 the US Senate held hearings on how to most effectively 
use the Serbian 'opposition' to effect US plans in Yugoslavia. Go to 
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/analysis/hearin.htm

(2) 'Back to the dark ages?' at 
http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/jared/bac.htm

An Impartial Tribunal? Really? at 
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/Impartial.htm

If you find emperors-clothes useful, we can use your help... 

(The Soros Foundation does NOT fund Emperors Clothes.) 

We rely on volunteer labor and donations. Our expenses include: Internet 
fees, Lexis, our Internet research tool, and phone bills. We use the phone a 
lot for interviews and to discuss editorial changes. 

Every month hundreds of thousands of people read articles from Emperor's 
Clothes. By making a contribution you will be helping to spread the word.

To make a donation, please mail a check to Emperor's Clothes, P.O. Box 
610-321, Newton, MA 02461-0321. (USA) 

Thanks for reading and for helping! 

www.tenc.net
[Emperor's Clothes]

_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist

Reply via email to