In a message dated 09/10/2000 5:29:41 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<<
But Milosevic has been behind some very brutal programs, and trying to
deny this is a case of overstating Yugoslavia's defense. People get
very suspicious when they think that you are overstating a defense.
So why do it? >>
What very "brutal polcies" ?.The statement is simply untrue. If anything,
Milsoevich has been too gentle. A little of US Grant would go a long way.
Now he seems a bit tougher. Excellent.
The "brutal polciies" argument relies on the impression given by the
newspapers. Of course, when when challenges impressions created by the media,
one upsets people. Who said it would be easy? Aabdo asks, why do it?
Because these "impressions: are used to neutralize opposition to war.
Chomsky's articles on Yugoslavia rely on those impressions - he never clearly
states what "crimes" he is talking about because "everyone knows". Aaabdo
does likewise. I said to Chomsky: either present evidence of these terrible
policies, or apologize and stop doing it. Ditto Aabdo.
Jared
_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist
