OK, Mark and Jo.     You guys are demanding that we stay pointedly to
topic.    So to retaliate, I am posting a Molly Ivins column.      Mark,
you will be glad to know that she is in general agreement with your
positions.

And I agree with her that we are, in fact, a species that has been
acting like a group of berserk beavers.      It was 111 degrees in San
Antonio last week.      It is now clear that we are going to hell at low
water.

We need to stop using so much water on the lawns in the rich
communities.      Plus, we need to take their air conditioners away from
them until they decide to behave.     No more gas guzzlers, either.
Why are the rich so stinky?

Sincerely,
A Concerned, Democratic Green- Tony
_________________________________
The Warming Of A World In Deep Denial
by Molly Ivins

AUSTIN, TEXAS - Let's all take a long step back and then look at this
again: Is the human race just another species in the long history of
Earth that's too dumb to adapt and survive? 

We clever upright primates have so far outstripped everyone save the
cockroaches, but we seem to be forgetting what knocked off so many of
the other major species: climate change. And if we're not smart enough
to learn from that, it's our turn to go extinct.

Nothing like a couple of days of 110-degree heat to remind us that
global warming has nothing to do with the end of the Cold War. According
to the fossilologists, the Big Ones, like the Ice Age, may have had a
proximate cause -- meteor hit, giant volcano eruption blotted out sun
... something happened. But in your relatively short tens of thousands
of years, all you get is a more or less cyclical back-and-forth. Now
coral reefs in the Pacific that are a thousand years old are dying. This
is not cyclical.

But aren't there some scientists who deny that any of this is happening,
or at least that it means global warming is taking place? Yes, about
seven of them, and in a remarkable act of journalistic irresponsibility,
it took the media years to report that most of them are directly or
indirectly in the pay of the oil companies. You can put the combined
weight of climatologists around the globe against that.

But don't some scientists say this will be a good thing? That Minnesota
will grow palm trees, Canada will become tropical, and they won't have
to eat oatmeal up there anymore?

A certain amount of don't-worry-be-happy is advisable in life, but we
are in such full-throttle denial about global warming that you can
barely get anyone to pay attention. It's all very well to swan through
life on the cheerful assumption that it's all part of God's Plan, but
God gave us brains so we could use them. And global warming is not God's
Deal -- it is mankind's.

We are the berserk beavers of the world, changing our own environment,
often for the worse even for us. Eventually everyone who listens finally
gets it, and the next reaction is often a whiny, "Well, what do you
expect me to do about it?"
The First Rule of Holes is: When you are in one, stop digging.

The still-unratified Kyoto treaty would require the United States to cut
its greenhouse gas emissions, primarily carbon dioxide and methane, to 7
percent below 1990 levels. That is not a solution, but it is a step.

Speaking of small steps, the Texas Natural Resource Conservation
Commission -- a pathetic thing, but the only EPA we've got here -- has
just opened its marble heart and agreed to study the situation. This is
another happy side effect of having Gov. George W. Bush run for
president -- it would look so dumb if his three environmental
commissioners were still denying the existence of global warming.

Since Texas emits more greenhouse gases than any other state, doing
something about it here would be a real contribution. Not that the TNRCC
is actually doing anything, but it has ordered up a big study, for which
we are all devoutly grateful.

One always appreciates those editorial voices of sweet reason saying,
"Now, let's not get hysterical here -- we're not doomed." No, we're not.
This is very likely fixable. The only reason to panic is the projection
studies on what will happen if we do nothing or let this get worse.
Major climate shifts can come quickly, within a few decades. The effects
of global warming are becoming so apparent that one can foresee the
congressional hearing in a few years -- like the Firestone tire comedy
last week -- with elected officials indignantly demanding: "Who knew
about this? Why didn't they tell us? Off with their heads!"

There may actually be more good news than bad news on global warming
lately, despite the ominous stats. James Hansen, the NASA climatologist
who has been helpful on global warming before, has a new study
suggesting a cheaper way out. Rather than concentrating on carbon
dioxide, which comes from burning fossil fuels, if we concentrate on
getting rid of the five other greenhouse gases (especially methane) it
could do as much good overall as cutting carbon dioxide from fossil
fuels.

Molly Ivins is a columnist for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.










_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist

Reply via email to