On this CrashList, we have two subscribers battling away at each other
over elections being stolen BEFORE the election.     One, an American
marxist, is correctly upset that the US government is stealing an
election in Yugoslavia,  by a combination of threat of war, and paying
for the 'opposition'.

The other subscriber is a European anarchist, who has seen the theft of
many a previous election by an entrenched government 'socialist'
bureaucracy, that uses state assets to maintan its clique in power.
This radical speaks of the need to resist, and not to support
(Milosevic).

Clinton's most current lie... as of this morning....
''It certainly appears from a distance that they had a free election and
somebody's trying to take it away from them,'' Clinton said at the White
House.

I print this to show that there is another way still, of seeing the
slogan 'resist, not support' (Clinton).      From the US, Jared has been
a model for resistance, while others refused all action.     Emperor's
Clothes was created precisely because no other English language source
was trying to expose the US lies, similar to that of Clinton's latest
disingenuous fib, just read.

As we write, anarchists like Andrej are involved in street actions in
Prague against capitalism.      And Rightists at antiwar.com are the
only semi-decent news source in the US, about what is happening in the
current standoff between the US and the crumbling government of
Milosevic.      But will these Rightists try to mobilize against the
capitalist system?   No..... they won't.

I want to use this moment to express unequivocally to Jared, my
solidarity with his efforts to RESIST.     We should stand with him in
solidarity when he takes on the Raimondo's and Flemings of the world.
However, we have to take quite a different view, when he launches
attacks on people like Andrej or Noam, in the effort to build support
for a Milosevic, as opposed to an effort to mobilize against US
imperialism.

Below, is an article for Jared to consider, with a slight change in
title to.... Capitalism and Communism Look Equally Bad in Belgrade....
It's off todays Common Dreams site ( a site that did not resist much,
the bombing of your country, Andrej).
__________________________________
Capitalism And Communism Look Equally Bad In Prague
by Naomi Klein

�What seems to most enrage the delegates to the meeting of the World
Bank and the International Monetary Fund in Prague this week is the idea
that they even have to discuss the basic benefits of free-market
globalization.

That discussion was supposed to have stopped in 1989, when the Wall fell
and history ended. Only here they all are -- old people, young people,
thousands of them -- literally storming the barricades of their
extremely important summit.

And as the delegates peer over the side of their ill-protected fortress
at the crowds below, scanning signs that say "Capitalism Kills," they
look terribly confused. Didn't these strange people get the memo? Don't
they understand that we all already decided that free-market capitalism
was the last, best system?

Sure, it's not perfect, and everyone inside the meeting is awfully
concerned about all those poor people and the environmental mess, but
it's not like there's a choice -- is there?

For the longest time, it seemed as if there were only two political
models: Western capitalism and Soviet communism. When the USSR
collapsed, that left only one alternative, or so it seemed. Institutions
like the World Bank and IMF have been busily "adjusting" economies in
Eastern Europe and Asia to help them get with the program: privatizing
services, relaxing regulation of foreign corporations, building huge
export industries.

All this is why it is so significant that yesterday's head-on attack
against the ideology ruling the World Bank and the IMF happened here, in
the Czech Republic. This is a country that has lived through both
economic orthodoxies, where the Lenin busts have been replaced by Pepsi
logos and McDonald's arches.

Many of the young Czechs I met this week say that their direct
experience with communism and capitalism has taught them that the two
systems have something in common: They both treat people as if they are
less than fully human. Where communism saw them only as potential
producers, capitalism sees them only as potential consumers; where
communism starved their beautiful capital, capitalism has overfed it,
turning Prague into a Velvet Revolution theme park.

The experience of growing up disillusioned with both systems helps
explain why so many of the activists behind this week's protests call
themselves "anarchists." Anarchism is an ideology that defines itself by
being fiercely non-ideological. It rejects externally imposed rules and
argues that we are impoverished, as individuals and as communities, by
overwork and overconsumption.

Most of us carry a mess of negative biases about anarchists. But the
truth is that most are less interested in hurling projectiles than in
finding ways to lead simple, autonomous lives. They call it "freedom."

So what do the lifestyle choices of a small (but growing) radical
subculture have to do with the allegations being made against the World
Bank and the IMF? Everything.

Far from simply demanding debt relief, the mass protests against the
Bank and Fund are now driven by more fundamental demands: the
elimination of both institutions, and of the economic beliefs that drive
their every decision.

Over the past decade, a critical mass of communities in poor countries
have questioned the Bank's belief that large-scale "development" always
equals "improvement."

The people coming forward have been displaced by World-Bank-funded
mega-dams and had their water systems polluted by World-Bank-funded
mines.

Are these people Communists? A few. But most aren't capitalists either.
They are tapping into something different, and much older. The young
anarchists in Prague, also gathered here from around the world, have
tapped into it too.

The Indian writer Arundhati Roy put it best, writing about her crusade
against a World-Bank-funded dam: "Perhaps what the 21st century has in
store for us is the dismantling of the Big. Big bombs, big dams, big
heroes, big mistakes. Perhaps it will be the Century of the Small."










_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist

Reply via email to