by

Sing C. Chew
Department of Sociology
Humboldt State University
Arcata, CA USA 95521
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Cite: Chew, Sing C., (1997). "For Nature: Deep Greening World-Systems
Analysis for the 21st Century." Journal of World-Systems Research
(http://csf.colorado.edu/wsystems/jwsr.html) 3: 381 - 402.


� Sing C. Chew, 1997 .

[Page 381]
Journal of World-Systems Research


----------------------------------------------------------------------
----------

Introduction


>From its conception the world-systems perspective has been preoccupied
with the study of long term global transformations (see for ex., Frank
1968, 1979; Wallerstein 1974; Amin 1974; Wolf, 1982; Chase-Dunn 1989;
Chase-Dunn and Hall 1992; Kaplan 1978).2 To this extent, the various
structural relationships, trends, and cycles of the world system have
been identified to explain the processes of global transformation. The
varied attempts to pinpoint and analyze these relations, trends, and
cycles have been within the context of connections between humans,
classes, status groups, industries, regions, and states in the world
economy. From an ecological point of view (ontologically and
epistemologically), such a manner of understanding change is quite
anthropocentric, as global transformation necessitates a changing
relationship with Nature. In an era of increasing global concern and
awareness of the finite nature of natural resources and the growing
realization of the contemporary losses in plant and animal species and
the continued susceptibility of the human species to climatological
changes and diseases despite various scientific and technological
advances, we need to consider that besides social relations and
structures, the basis of human reproduction includes our relationships
with the non-human world (ecology). World-systems/world system
analyses need to move beyond deciphering the processes of global
change only through the social (anthropocentric) dimension of the
relations underlining these processes. Keeping to just the social
relations/structures of the reproduction of the system limits the
range of explanations we can provide for global transformation, and
also restricts the dimensions whereby the basis for these changes can
be explored. This paper is an attempt to introduce the other basic
dimension (our relations with Nature) into the overall equation of
world-systems/world system analyses for our understanding of global
change. Ultimately, it is this Culture/Nature relation along with the
dynamics of Nature that in the long run determines the trajectory of
the transformation of the world system. The purpose of this paper is
to "green" the world-systems/world system analyses to date, and to
suggest (ontologically and epistemologically) an ecocentric world
system history approach beyond a humanocentric world system history
analysis that has been proposed by Frank and Gills (1992(a), 1992(b)).


_______________________________________________
Crashlist resources: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.wwpublish.com/mailman/listinfo/crashlist

Reply via email to