> Is it possible that this sort of Maoist reasoning is still actual?
> I do not know, I have not the slightest idea why, but article written by
> Mike Albert , taken as a pretext for attack on ZNet, is completely
> misinterpreted.
Red-Baiting, and useless. First you spend your energy attacking people who attack
those who bombed your country rather than those who attack the government targetted
by that bombing. Fine, I expect such "logic"from an Anarchist on this matter. But now
you resort to crude flaming deeply indebted to the ghost of Joe McCarthy. I can't be
bothered to read such spittle, Andrej. I like Albert, sometimes, but I don't think
that opposing him automatically makes one a Maoist. You need to do a lot more study
of the Chinese reality from the last 3/4 of the century before one gets that honour.
Nonetheless, you need more substantiation and less crude labels to reach anyone.
Is it possiblew that this kind of Ararchist idiocy is still real? Didn't it get
imploded with the IWW?
Macdonald
_______________________________________________
CrashList website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base
