Science decodes human mystery 

Gene sleuths explain how we're designed 



There has been a renewed confirmation of the remarkable unity of humanity, regardless 
of race, gender or nationality.

Every person shares 99.99 percent of his or her genetic code with all other people, a 
paper in the journal Science reports. And people from different racial groups can have 
more in common genetically than people of the same race. The other research will be 
presented in the journal Nature.



February 12, 2001

BY ROBERT S. BOYD
FREE PRESS WASHINGTON STAFF

WASHINGTON -- Heralding a new era in biology and medicine, two rival teams of 
scientists are to present today their first interpretations of the human genome, the 
complex set of minuscule instructions that specify a person.

These initial findings on how humans are built -- the first since the breaking of the 
genetic code was announced in June -- will be published later this week in two 
scientific journals. Among the findings:



Humans have about 30,000 genes, far fewer than the 100,000 or so that were expected 
and barely twice as many as the fruit fly.


There has been a renewed confirmation of the remarkable unity of humanity, regardless 
of race, gender or nationality.

Every person shares 99.99 percent of his or her genetic code with all other people, a 
paper in the journal Science reports. And people from different racial groups can have 
more in common genetically than people of the same race. The other research will be 
presented in the journal Nature.


"It is clear that what is called 'race,' although culturally important, reflects just 
a few traits determined by a tiny fraction of our genes," said the author of the 
Science paper, Svante Paabo, a German expert on evolutionary genetics.


These first comprehensive portraits of the human genetic code allow "some questions to 
be resolved and new mysteries to emerge," the lead paper in Nature declares.


The 40 scientific reports are the first fruits of an intensive effort by researchers 
around the world to make sense of -- and find practical uses for -- the listing of 
most of the 3 billion bases in the human genetic code.


The entire code is known as the genome. A copy of the genome, the famous double helix 
of DNA, is coiled up in every cell in the body. It contains the instructions for 
building that cell and making it do its job.


The reports, totaling hundreds of pages accompanied by colorful tables and charts, 
come a little more than half a year after rival teams of public and private 
researchers around the globe announced that they separately had determined the proper 
order, or sequence, of 95 percent of the bases -- A's, C's, G's and T's -- that make 
up the human genetic alphabet.


One of the teams, a 16-nation public consortium, headed by the University of 
Michigan's Francis Collins, will publish its preliminary analysis of the genome in 
Thursday's edition of Nature, a British journal. Collins is on leave from the school 
to be director of the U.S. National Institute of Health's Human Genome Project.


The other group is a private team headed by Craig Venter, chief executive officer of 
Celera Genomics Corp. The team's reports will be published in Friday's edition of 
Science, a publication of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.


The reports were not supposed to be made public until today, but a British newspaper, 
the Observer, violated the embargo on Sunday.


Although the two teams used different methods, their portraits of the genome are 
almost identical.


"Never before have we published a collection of papers as informative or as 
breathtaking in the scope of what it reveals about human life," said Nature's editor 
in chief, Philip Campbell. "Every editor dreams of a day like today."


Eric Lander, a geneticist at the Whitehead Institute in Cambridge, Mass., wrote in 
Nature: "We find it humbling to gaze upon the human sequence as it comes into focus. 
In principle, the string of genetic bits holds long-sought secrets of human 
development, physiology and medicine. In practice, our ability to transform such 
information into understanding remains woefully inadequate."


Several of the reports acknowledged that sequencing the genome is only the beginning 
of a vast scientific enterprise. Genes, they say, are only a parts list for the 
construction of a human being.


Genes provide the instructions for making the proteins -- far more numerous and 
complicated biological compounds -- that do the real work of building tissue and 
making organs function properly.


As a result, research on proteins -- known as proteomics -- is now exploding in 
government, academic and commercial laboratories.


"The future belongs to proteomics," Stanley Fields, a researcher at the Howard Hughes 
Medical Institute in Seattle wrote in Science.


A major puzzle in the reports is how a relatively few genes can produce the far 
greater number of proteins a human being requires. The latest estimates of the gene 
population range from 23,000 to 39,000, but the final number is expected to be around 
30,000.


The low count means that a person has barely twice as many genes as a fruit fly , less 
than twice as many as a worm -- and only five times as many as a single-celled 
bacterium. A common roadside weed, thale cress, has 26,000 genes, almost as many as a 
person.


((((((((

Key discoveries 

February 12, 2001

Humans have only about 30,000 genes, much lower than the 100,000 or so genes 
scientists were expecting. 

 Inherited genetic mutations arise about twice as often in men than in women.

Scientists are finding that genes instruct numerous proteins to build tissue and 
organs. The study of proteins is booming.
 
)))))))))

What does it all mean? 

February 12, 2001




So science now knows much about our genes -- with so much more that needs to be 
learned. What will be the effect?


 Cures: Mental illness, addiction, and even criminal traits  ( Yuk  !!!!! -CB )can be 
found inside the genetic code. 


"Ultimately, the human genome sequence will revolutionize psychology and psychiatry," 
said Dr. Peter McGuffin, coauthor of an analysis in the upcoming edition of the 
journal Science.


McGuffin, a researcher at the Institute of Psychiatry at Kings College in London, and 
other experts contend that finding genes that influence behavior may lead to drugs 
that can treat or prevent some of society's major problems.


"The sequencing of the human genome will improve our ability to identify the genetic 
risk factors ...for a whole variety of conditions, from addiction to criminality to 
antisocial personality," said Dr. Eric Nestler, chairman of the department of 
psychiatry, University of Texas, Southwest Medical Center in Dallas. "This is going to 
be an enormous advance for this field."


Instead of the current one-size-for-all pharmaceuticals, itis possible for drugs to be 
specifically tailored to fit the unique pattern of genes in an individual patient, 
McGuffin said.


Fixing the problems early: Mutations in the human genome predispose or cause at least 
1,500 conditions, ranging from diabetes and asthma to cancer and heart disease.


The connection between gene mutation and disease will become much clearer now, experts 
say.


In the future, newborns may be screened for treatable genetic diseases and "children 
at high risk of coronary artery disease can be identified and treated to prevent 
changes in their vascular walls during adulthood," thus preventing heart attacks, 
according to Dr. Leena Peltonen of the University of California at Los Angeles, and 
Dr. Victor McKusick at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.


It may now be possible, said Barbara Trask of the Hutchinson Cancer Center for medical 
science to pinpoint in each patient the genes that have gone awry and caused cancer, 
and then to design a treatment specifically for that problem.


(((((((
Experts, patients fear discrimination 

Gene info could sway employers and insurers 
February 12, 2001

BY PAUL RECER
ASSOCIATED PRESS

WASHINGTON -- Mapping the human genome opens a new era for medical science -- and a 
new frontier for potential discrimination.



New genetic research may make it possible to identify an individual's lifetime risk of 
cancer, heart attack and other diseases. Experts say they worry that this information 
could also be used to discriminate in hiring, promotions or insurance.


Employers and insurers could save millions of dollars if they could use predictive 
genetics to identify in advance, and then reject, workers or policy applicants who are 
predisposed to develop chronic disease.


Thus, genetic discrimination could join the list of other forms of discrimination: 
racial, ethnic, age and gender. 


Fear of such discrimination already is affecting how people view the medical 
revolution promised by mapping the human genome. A Time/CNN poll found last summer 
that 75 percent of 1,218 people in the United States surveyed did not want insurance 
companies to know their genetic code, and 84 percent wanted that information withheld 
from the government.


"There has been widespread fear that an individual's genetic information will be used 
against them," said Sen. Bill Frist, R-Tenn. To improve the quality of health care, 
"we must begin taking steps to eliminate patients' fears," said Frist, the only 
physician in the Senate.


A recent national survey of 2,133 employers by the American Management Association 
found that seven are using genetic testing for either job applicants or employees, 
according to the journal Science.


Many experts contend the only solution to potential genetic discrimination is a new 
federal law that specifically prohibits it.


Frist and Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, are planning to introduce legislation that 
would prevent insurance companies from requiring genetic testing and ban the use of 
genetic information to deny coverage or to set rates.


A similar bill, the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance Act, 
passed the Senate in 2000 as part of an appropriations bill, but the provision later 
was removed.


Writing this week in the journal Science, Sens. James Jeffords, R-Vt., and Tom 
Daschle, D-S.D., say they both favor legislation prohibiting genetic discrimination.


_______________________________________________
CrashList website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base

Reply via email to