> Yoshie >>wrote:

 > *****   New York Times 28 February 2001
 > 
 > U.S. and NATO Back Serbian Access to Kosovo Buffer Zone
 > 
 > By JANE PERLEZ
 > 
 > BRUSSELS, Feb. 27 - Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said today 
 > that the United States was prepared to allow Serbian soldiers back 
 > into a three-mile-wide buffer zone along the Kosovo border, where 
 > Albanian militants have been increasingly active.
 > 
 > What do Jared & others on the CrashList think of this development?
 > 
 > Yoshie >>

Hi, Yoshie.  Yeah, I saw that too.  I think NATO is playing a many-faceted 
game and as with all such games, which involve real thrusts and pretended 
thrusts to disguise the real ones and to produce specific effects in groups 
they are trying to undermine,  the key is to  get the big picture and ask: 
what are they after?  This is like the problem with card tricks.  The 
magician has some simple method of knowing the card, but he goes through very 
complex maneuvers which he wishes you to believe are decisive, so you don't 
notice that he palmed the thing and looked at the bottom of the deck.

So: what are they after? They are after the destruction of the cement of 
Balkans unity, which is the Serbian people.  This cannot be done without the 
physical destruction, that is murder, of about a million people.  Remember 
Indonesia.

Right now, there are many small struggles  and some not so small going on all 
over Serbia.  But they are not yet fully linked and the people are not yet in 
the state of mind to see the political character of their oppression - they 
see: no electricity, layoffs, theft of businesses they in essence owned, and 
so on.  Whatever.  But not fully the connection with the Kosthunitsa 
government.

The formerly part-bureaucratic part-real Socialist Party has had the bad/good 
fortune of shedding some dead weight.  NATO maintains a deception in my 
opinion through the use of Koshtunitsa who talks from both sides of mouth 
(the speculations over his "honesty" not withstanding) but there is 
increasing clarity.  NATO wishes to destroy the Serbs but wishes to avoid a 
straight-out confrontation with the formidable Yugoslav Army.  The army is 
politically torn.  NATO wishes to finesse the situation, breaking the army as 
an effective force before engaging it - if ever.

Thus NATO a) verbally denounces the KLA b) trains and arms and provides air 
cover for the KLA c) orders (through its stooges, the present regime) 
Yugoslav security forces not to fire their weapons except in extreme 
circumstances d) promises and promises and promises to stop the KLA which 
meanwhile has literally set up customs booths on roads from inner Serbia to 
Kosovo!  Do you see?  They are stalling for time while they consolidate the 
KLA's provocative abilities and attempt to  demoralize the army in 
preparation for replacing as much of the Yugo loyalist officers as possible - 
all at the same time.  Meanwhile AT THE SAME TIME, the French whose struggle 
against the Anglo-US gang seems able to rise only to the level of gossip, 
have leaked the story that NATO will use the KLA presence in Precevo Valley 
as an excuse to send in NATO troops.  So they promise pie in the sky ("we 
will let you into the buffer zone, etc. etc.) while in fact, they plan 
invasion. 

The KLA forces are not rebellious Albanians, they are a mercenary division of 
the U.S. marines or special forces which the BBC admits trains them. They are 
incapable of defeating the Yugoslavs without immense help from NATO, hence 
the complex shell game as the KLA becomes further entrenched, terrorizing all 
ethnic groups increasingly further into inner Serbia, and the future fight of 
the Yugoslav army becomes tactically more and more difference while NATO 
attempts to demoralize it internally.

jared

_______________________________________________
CrashList website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base

Reply via email to