This is much better. You're back. Unsubbing and resubbing people is boring and
a hassle. I'd like to not have to do it.

Mark

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Abdo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 05 March 2001 23:05
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: :The Sinking of the Ehime Maru: Not An Accident
>
>
> Well, Mark has said that what I wrote  was a pure flame, and unsubbed me
> from CrashList.      And I think that he was right in what he says.
>
> My intention is not to discredit Jared and Emperor's Clothes, though.
> I think that Jared does that to himself, by the type of commentary that
> this was just one example of.
>
> <Since there were so many "foreseeably" harmful consequences, his action
> involved harassment.
> Therefore this was not an accident. Period. The fact that I do not
> pretend to be sure what happened inside the sub - how could I be sure? -
> does not mean it is wrong to be definite on this one question: this was
> a criminal act, not an accident.>
>
> Yes, I certainly agree here with you, Jared.     Criminal negligence is
> a crime.     However, criminal negligence is not murder- first degree.
> The whole commentary seemed to ramble into a series of conjectures, that
> then implied that in fact, there was a deliberate plot to kill.     The
> evidence is just not available to us with sufficient clarity, to make
> these types of leaps in logic and accusation.
>
> What is most probable, is that it was just another in a large and
> growing number of callous usage of military hardware, played with as a
> toy.      This is definitely a crime, in and of itself.
>
> As to the question of whether I hate and want to discredit Emperors
> Clothes, or Jared himself.......?     This simply is not true Jared.
> I, and countless others also, want to be your biggest fan.      There is
> a tremendous need for a site like Emperors Clothes to be much bigger,
> and more comprehensive.
>
> What keeps us from being able to throw ourselves into open and
> unconditional support, is the type of one dimensional commentary that
> leads us into exposed areas of borderline paranoia, such as that which
> was put forth in the article about this incident.    It is like that
> Emperors Clothes wants to emphatically march us off into ambushes, and
> then screams at us shrilly when we are relunctant to follow, marching
> double time.
>
> Ultimately, it is you Jared, that has to decide if you want to continue
> seeing 'enemies' everywhere (such as I), when in fact we are your most
> potential allies in the struggles you consider important.
>
> Let me make the last thing I write here, apologizing for the flame.
> It's true that I made my point, but it was done in a personalized manner
> as Mark has pointed out.    For that, I am sorry, Jared.
>
> Tony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


_______________________________________________
CrashList website: http://website.lineone.net/~resource_base

Reply via email to