On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:43 AM, William Tanksley, Jr
<wtanksle...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jude <bookofj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't like this. Surrounding it with parentheses makes it stand out
>> better, regardless of whether or not it's short, long, or multi-line.
>
> Could you explain why? Using parentheses makes it look like a function
> call instead of a statement. Nobody's going to DIE because of that
> :-), but I don't understand the justification that it "makes it stand
> out", when all projects I've been on said the opposite.

I'm not sure I can? "Because I find it easier to read" is a pretty
good explanation, and I'm hopeful is the one I implied. If that
doesn't suffice, I'm not sure I can extrapolate further. The shape of
the characters, the fact that they take up large vertical spaced
opposed to smaller vertical space for the surrounded characters?

> I think I'd better add that I can't afford to argue here... I've
> written a lot of code, but none for Crawl. It would be better to set
> ANY standard than none, and it's more important to avoid widespread
> changes than to pick a perfect standard that changes a ton of things.

I'm quite happy with the current general standard that we've got and
Rafael's suggested additions apart from this one. Note ,we already
have a rather large coding conventions guideline, so it's not a
question of setting "ANY" standard, but adjusting our current
standard.

-Jude

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus 
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list
Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss

Reply via email to