On 26 January 2011 11:28, Raphael Langella <raphael.lange...@gmail.com> wrote: > Whenever foo resists poison (can be an ally), we check all the monsters. If > it is intelligent, has foo as a target and can see it, we set a boolean > (target_resists_poison). Then, when evaluating available attacks, we skip > the poisonous ones (except poison arrow of course) if the boolean is set.
Sounds good. However, I wouldn't bother with tracking ally resistances, at least to begin with. > I wouldn't bother with other resists, as poison is the only one that can be > completely resisted. Well reasoned. I agree. > As a side note, I noticed dragons are only I_ANIMAL. Wouldn't it be more > appropriate for them to be I_NORMAL, at least for the stronger ones (golden > and pearl)? I think that at some point we decided that draconians are the dragons' intelligent cousins. Allowing for non-unique intelligent dragons would blur that distinction. (I say "non-unique" because Xtahua is an obvious exception, but then we've got an intelligent spellcaster slug, so I guess it's okay if uniques are treated specially.) Johanna ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)! Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free! Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss
