On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 02:30:32PM +1000, Jude wrote:
> Our standard parlance is that "dlua" is "Dungeon Lua", and "clua" is
> "Client Lua", but that brings confusion when one looks in dat: there's
> a "lua" folder and a "clua" folder [that are reversed]
> * Rename dat/clua to dat/dlua, move common files into dat/common_lua
> (say), rename dat/lua to dat/clua. No change to any of the wrapper
> files as such. Easiest.
It also, unlike the other solution, preserves the notions of "dlua" and
"clua". Having only one set of names is good. I prefer this.
> * Rename dat/clua to dat/lua/priv, move common files into
> dat/lua/util, rename dat/lua to dat/lua/pub. Change the parlance in
> the contained files to "publua" and "privlua" instead of "clua" and
> "dlua". This would be harder but remove any current and future
> confusion between crawl's "Two Luas".
Any possible confusion is for us as users don't see anything but clua.
And for us, having the same names as all around the C++ code is important.
--
1KB // Microsoft corollary to Hanlon's razor:
// Never attribute to stupidity what can be
// adequately explained by malice.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What You Don't Know About Data Connectivity CAN Hurt You
This paper provides an overview of data connectivity, details
its effect on application quality, and explores various alternative
solutions. http://p.sf.net/sfu/progress-d2d
_______________________________________________
Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list
Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss
