On Sun, 13 Mar 2011, Chris Campbell wrote: > I'd suggest just removing it - Stoneskin and Ozo's Armour are decently > differentiated and both useful, so making a third spell with a similar > effect accessible to players doesn't seem necessary (and it doesn't > really seem interesting enough to warrant keeping it as a Xom-only thing).
I have this idea that Stonemail incurs slower moving speed (like a ponderous body armour). Is this true? If so, would the spell be potentially interesting? I agree that without any feature beyond "Earth spell that increases AC", the spell should just go. David > On 12/03/2011 18:59, David Ramsey wrote: >> Given that several spells in trunk have been removed, reduced to >> monster-only spells, or reduced to Invocation-only effects, I'm >> wondering whether something should be done about the Stonemail spell. >> Currently, it's only available in-game as one of the spells that Xom can >> make you cast. Considering that it can be used by players who can't use >> Stoneskin, should it be put in one of the higher-level Earth spellbooks, >> or just removed due to its similarity to Stoneskin? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss
