On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The versioning of pre-releases is problematic.
>
> If you have the following versions:
> * 0.9.0-a0-foo-bar
> * 0.9.0-a17-quux
> * 0.9.0-rc1
> * 0.9.0
> * 0.9.1
> all dev builds sort after final 0.9.0.
>
> This seems to be easily fixable by skipping ".0".  "-" < ".", so all our
> releases: alpha, beta, rc and finals, would compare correctly.
>
> Thus, I'd propose to re-tag current trunk as "0.9-a1", and not add the third
> number until a final release.
>
> Would you be ok with that?

Sounds fine to me.

-J

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fulfilling the Lean Software Promise
Lean software platforms are now widely adopted and the benefits have been 
demonstrated beyond question. Learn why your peers are replacing JEE 
containers with lightweight application servers - and what you can gain 
from the move. http://p.sf.net/sfu/vmware-sfemails
_______________________________________________
Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list
Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss

Reply via email to