hurcan solter <hsol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Â Crawl has a MSVC port but it doesn't work and sadly it's a dead > weight at the moment .Fearing it will sink > into oblivion like its DOS predecessor (failed joke attempt) ,I've > modified to source code to compile on msvc > and painstakingly ported from GNU build system to Cmake. it's not > perfect.There were many things I > couldn't understand so I've left them out but I am sure there are some > people among you that could fix > it if inclined or instruct me how to do so.
I've heard very good things about CMake. You might want to explain a little about why you chose it and what it can do for us, though, aside from the obvious one of supporting MSVC (if that were all it did, it wouldn't be worth keeping around, since it would just bitrot). I see someone else is asking that question. I recall CMake has some advantages, but you must know them better than I. -Wm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay _______________________________________________ Crawl-ref-discuss mailing list Crawl-ref-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/crawl-ref-discuss
