wow, I'm never typing on my phone again. sorry about that. And thanks for the clarification Leonard.
So, its a good guess that free software wont have influence in the making of this format (for the benefit of its own features) But the good news is its likely that if documented enough, we'll be able to implement and translate the majority of features anyway. we can do the 'inkscape trick' and maintain an open raster namespace that performs advanced functionality on top of the base features of this format. I guess then it just depends how the adobe tools end up parsing files with attributes it doesnt recognise (should just ignore them) so what's this OpenRaster vs FXG stuff... we should have both. Andy On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Andy Fitzsimon <andyf...@gmail.com> wrote: > To be fair, Adobe aquired both those properties from former developers. So > rhe binar blobs of doom were iherited. > > Now they have a chance to do things right > > On 13/05/2009, at 11:48 AM, Hubert Figuiere <h...@figuiere.net> wrote: > >> On 05/12/2009 11:40 PM, Andy Fitzsimon wrote: >>> >>> Reckon there's a frantion of a chance they make this an open >>> unrestricted standard? >> >> >> Like Flash? Or like PSD? >> >> >> Hub > _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list CREATE@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
