On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 20:54 +0200, Cyrille Berger wrote: > > >  > > > > > > Any comments or suggestions? > > > > > > /Øyvind K. > > > > This all looks pretty interesting...where else is this spec'd out? > > Krita-devs, what are you guys thinking? Pippin, it would be great to get > > some more core gimp developers on here to discuss this as well... > yes it interesting :) and it's close to what we (krita-devs) have in mind, > and > it's also close to the current krita fileformat which seems to be performing > well currently. > > as for the <openraster />, note that as we want it to be close to opendoc, > and > maybe accept as an opendoc file format, there will be used of "namespace", > tags will looks like "odr:layer" ... > > The spec shouldn't be the priority, pippin's playing with gegl+xml and mine > in > krita and convergence is more important right now, this way we can be sure > that the file format will work well. >
Cyrille, do you have documentation of the new krita format on-line? Hopefully we can compare the two continuously and push for merging, or at least hope for it :) Jon -- Jon Phillips San Francisco, CA USA PH 510.499.0894 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rejon.org MSN, AIM, Yahoo Chat: kidproto Jabber Chat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] IRC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Inkscape (http://inkscape.org) Open Clip Art Library (www.openclipart.org) Creative Commons (www.creativecommons.org) San Francisco Art Institute (www.sfai.edu) _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
