On Friday 13 June 2008, Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote: > Am 12.06.08, 18:32 -0400 schrieb Liam R E Quin: > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 21:20 +0200, Cyrille Berger wrote: > > [...] > > > > > 1) <filter name="standard:blur" type="standard:gaussianblur"> > > > <params> > > > <param name="radius">10</param> > > > </params> > > > </filter> > > > > > > 2) <filter:standard:blur radius="10" /> > > > > > > 3) <filter:standard:blur> > > > <radius>10</radius> > > > </filter:standard:blur> > > Giving "filter" a more distinguishable name would help reusing them. > Otherwise it is possible that filters get confused during XML > processing and parameters dont match? > "xmlns:openraster:filter"
Adding a namespace is allways a possibility, when you want to reuse, even if it's not defined in the original spec. > As well radius has a integer value. It would be nice to see: > a) this being declared (xs:int ?) Sure. Most likely with a default type when not specified. > b) to make options a non pixel thing, e.g. move to a precentage > relationship How would you define a percentage for a radius ? -- Cyrille Berger _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
