On Friday, June 19, 2009, 7:09:02 PM, Liam wrote: LREQ> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 09:33 +0200, Martin Renold wrote: >> hi,
>> I did ask this at least twice while doing the file layout specification, and >> I proposed "image/openraster" as MIME type, and the answer was silence. LREQ> Shouldn't it be image/openraster+xml ? And (if its going to be in the Standards tree, previously called the IETF tree/, then it should be registered. I agree that for an open format, the standards tree makes more sense than the personal/vanity or vendor-specific trees. For one thing there is no 'vendor'... -- Chris Lilley mailto:[email protected] Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
