On 8/8/10, Gregory Pittman wrote: > I think maybe the Create site could work if it had a different/better > portal, where what's there now could be accessed from it, but you could > have other directions to go from that portal.
There is another thing I'm quite concerned with: the blogs aggregator. Right now we have two planets running simultaneously and started by two people at more or less the same time (create's one and graphicsplanet.org), and I'm quilty of having supported both (it was partly because getting SSH access on new fd.o machine didn't work back in time). I don't really know how many people read each: neither have feedburner based RSS, so it's hard to tell. But I have a feeling that two planets is an overkill. >From maintenance point of view graphicsplanet.org is a successor: it has two maintainers (muks and me) and relies on a newer engine. CREATE's planet is unmaintained AFAIK and uses old engine. OTOH from integration POV create's planet is better, if you intend to build new stuff on top of create. And thus I'm back to square one :-/ What do you think? Alexandre Prokoudine http://libregraphicsworld.org _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
