hi greg, so we need two forms:
- one per project to collect rapports - one person to collect feedback on the lgm fine to me! i'll prepare a draft and submit it for review later today. ciao a.l.e > I worry about having an excessively open-ended survey. > I think it's worth the time to try to come up with a list of > questions which people would be likely to want to answer and that > also give some useful information. > > So perhaps some categories might be considered, and perhaps it should > be said that one can choose to respond to any or all they might > select: > > (after shown a list of the talks as a reminder)... > which talks stand out as the most interesting to you? Why? > Which speakers gave talks which were > entertaining/informative/mentally stimulating? Add details as you > like. What have you learned at LGM 2012 that you did not know about > or understand before you attended? > Was the number of talks too many? not enough? > Was there anything you were hoping to be presented that didn't happen? > Did you have productive meetings outside of the scheduled talks? How > were they productive? > Did you attend any workshops that were interesting/helpful/useful? > Do you feel that the attendance (numbers and the particular > individuals) made for a good audience and discussions? > > It's also useful for those responding to identify themselves as to > developer, user, professional user, enthusiast, etc. (I suppose some > could be all of these) > > I only mean this as an initial framework to add to, subtract from, or > refine as others see fit. > > Greg > _______________________________________________ > CREATE mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create _______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
