mray wrote: >> I think that mray meant that on a per-font basis. > > My concern is not to bury the otf•UI in a non obvious way. > I think part of the solution has to be to find a consensus on how to > indicate that the application at hand offers otf•UI at all. > Similar to the "bold", "italic" and "underline" that indicate simple > rich text editing. > Just providing means to successfully control otf features isn't enough.
--ps
designs interaction for creatives +
solutions with a wide impact on society
teacher, mentor, author, lecturer
http://mmiworks.net/peter
integrating the otf controls (in several standard situations,
not specific applications, but types and layouts of UI) is
definitely part of the design. this is the ‘indication’
and ‘access’ that we are talking about.
--ps
street photographer : ultra-fi builder : on drums...
(new adventures in) http://ultra-fi.blogspot.com
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ CREATE mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/create
