Hi Tony, Alternatively we could interpret the ORDER as a specific identifier, an Appellation of parts? Neither that would require a change. This is consistent with regarding spatial coordinates as identifiers.
To measure immaterial objects seems very reasonable to me, also for playing durations of video etc., see http://metadata.net/harmony/MW2002_paper.pdf. This proposal would require the domain of P43: Has Dimension to be promoted from E18: Physical Stuff to it's superclass, E70: Stuff. and P39 measured (was measured by) to E70: Stuff. It seems, that this was the last open amendment issue. I think the impression of the audience in the last meeting, that we have understood the CRM as a total and can close the amendments to the model with the upcoming meeting has proven right. Since the last meeting, we had close collaboration with Jane Hunter on the MPEG7 mapping to the CRM and with ABC Harmony, coming to complete agreements in both cases. The latter will be published soon, and confirms the positioning of FRBR Manifestation we had discussed already in Monterey and Patrick's work. All experience of the agreement with Harmony is contained in the proposals done. With this step we have taken into account all the communities the CRM intends to enable communication with. By the way, the CRM appears now as: ISO 21127 : "A reference ontology for the interchange of cultural heritage information" Looking forward to see you next week. Martin Tony Gill wrote: > > Background: > >From discussion of issue 13 the need to model sequences of physical and > conceptual objects also need to be added to the issues list. This could > include page numbers, periodical series, acts in a play etc. > > (Note to Martin: On the web page, Issue 36 background erroneously contains > the following text fragment from another issue: "Guidance for museums etc. > to distinguish between titles and other appellations.") > > Proposal to be compatible with METS: > http://www.loc.gov/standards/mets/METSOverview.html#structmap > > Proposal: > The METS schema uses a series of nested DIV elements to represent compound > digital objects. The DIV elements have an ORDER attribute, used to record > an integer representation of the DIV's order with respect to it's > siblings. I propose that we model ORDER as a specialization of E54 > Dimension. This would not require the addition of any additional classes > to the CRM. > > However, since sequences can apply to both physical objects (e.g. folios > in a manuscript) or information objects (e.g. sequences of digital page > images), this proposal would require the domain of P43: Has Dimension to > be promoted from E18: Physical Stuff to it's superclass, E70: Stuff. and P39 measured (was measured by) to E70: Stuff. > > N.B. The scope note for property P43 (CRM v3.3.1) is compatible with this > proposal, although it needs to be copy-edited for grammar. > > Cheers, > > T. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tony Gill <[email protected]>, RLG <http://www.rlg.org/> > 1200 Villa Street, Mountain View, CA 94041 USA > Voice: +1 (650) 691-2304 <> Fax: +1 (650) 964-1461 -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(810)391625 | Principle Researcher | Fax:+30(810)391609 | Project Leader SIS | Email: [email protected] | | Information Systems Laboratory | Institute of Computer Science | Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) | | Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece | | Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl | --------------------------------------------------------------
