Dear All,

Following the decision in Copenhagen, here my proposal:

E2 Temporal Entity

Subclass of:    CRM Entity
Superclass of:  Condition State
                        Period

Scope note:    This is an abstract entity and has no examples. It groups
               together transient phenomena such as events, states and others,
               which are limited in time, also called perdurants. It is 
specialized
               into Period, which holds on some geographic area, and Condition 
State,
               which holds for, on, or over a certain object. Even though 
Persitent
               Items (or endurants) have a limited existence in time, because 
they may
               be destroyed, lost or forgotten, we regard them as disjoint from
               Temporal Enties, as their persistent identity allows to
               relate Temporal Entities in which they participate.

E77 Persistent Item

Subclass of:    CRM Entity
Superclass of:  Stuff
Contact Point
Appellation
Actor

Scope note:     E77 Persistent Item encompasses (and thereby isolates) entities
                which share two attributes: having the potential to exist over a
                period of time, and having persistent identity during this 
period
                of existence. These attributes are intended to apply to both
                concrete objects, whether animate or inanimate and to ideas or 
concepts.
                Hypothetical or imaginary objects fall within this category 
insofar
                as they can be considered as conceptual objects i.e. E77 
Persistent Item
                is not intended to be restricted to physical existence. 
Persistent Items
                are also called endurants.

                The conditions under which an object can be deemed to maintain
                its identity are often difficult to establish - the decision 
depends
                largely on the judgement of the observer. Most people would 
agree,
                for example, that a building ceases to exist if it is dismantled
                and the materials reused in a different configuration. Human 
beings,
                on the other hand, in common with many other organisms, go 
through
                radical and profound changes during their life-span, affecting 
both
                material composition and form, yet preserve their identity. But
                also material objects in daily use also undergo material changes
                due to maintenance etc. without changing identity. Identity in
                these cases would seem to depend more on continuity rather than
                the presence of any particular physical state or component.

                The main classes of objects which fall outside the scope of
                E77 Persistent Item are Temporal Entities such as periods, 
events and
                acts, and descriptive properties, (such as dimensions) which 
function
                as adjectives and adverbs. The latter depend in there identity
                on the object they are assigned to. The former acquire an 
identity
                only through the changes participating Persistent Items 
undergo, but not
                out of their own form or substance. We regard them as disjoint 
from
                Temporal Entities.

As there are endless debates about the temporal nature of objects,
(so-called 3-dimensionalists and 4-dimensionalists), I propose not to waste
our precious time in the next meeting to discuss, to which degree we can find
logical terms to separate E2 and E77. For me, this is hopeless from the 
beginning,
and not helpful.

I have never seen a reasonable documentation structure, that puts
objects under events because of their limited life-span. Nor have I seen someone
saying that an event "participates" or is "present at". The evidence in data 
structures
is that they are disjoint.

Scope Notes are no logical formulas. They remind us our common concepts.
In that spirit, I have deleted the phrase about "persistent identity of
temporal entities", which was, I believe a misinterpretation of "persistent"
in Persistent Item. The "persistence" is, that we can find it again and say
"I have seen that before". For an Event you would say: "Oh, it's still going
on".

So, please make all proposals for this "hot" scope note BEFORE the meeting.

Cheers,

Martin

--

--------------------------------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(810)391625         |
 Principle Researcher          |  Fax:+30(810)391609         |
 Project Leader SIS            |  Email: [email protected] |
                                                             |
               Information Systems Laboratory                |
                Institute of Computer Science                |
   Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
                                                             |
 Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
                                                             |
         Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl               |
--------------------------------------------------------------


Reply via email to