Dear Martin,
There are two opposite terms explicitly mentioned in different parts
of the text
"universals" (mentioned in the scope note only) -
"This class comprises arbitrary concepts (universals)..."
and "particulars" (mentioned in the preceding text only) -
"...these terms [types] are dealt with as particulars in the CRM...".
These terms are not opposed in to each other (particulars are used to
represent universals).
If it is clear to anyone, then it's OK.
Anyway, I vote ACCEPT.
Best regards,
Vladimir
2008/6/4 martin <[email protected]>:
> Dear All,
>
> Following the decision in the last meeting, we have to decide via e-mail
> vote on
> the updated attached text about types in the CRM document. I have
> desparately tried to
> describe as exact as possible what the CRM does, and to avoid the metaclass
> question, once this is a philosophical rather than an applied question in
> the
> current form the CRM describes.
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> ACCEPT [ ]
>
> REQUEST MODIFICATION: [....]
>
> by June 12.
>
> Best,
>
> Martin
> --
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
> Principle Researcher | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
> | Email: [email protected] |
> |
> Center for Cultural Informatics |
> Information Systems Laboratory |
> Institute of Computer Science |
> Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
> |
> Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
> |
> Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crm-sig mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
>
>
