Dear Nick,
I think only you and Patrick can answer this question: What do other standards
do about verification?
To my understanding, other ISO standards do not contain the detailed procedure
in the standard text
itself. I think the next step is not elaborating more and more procedures, but
collection examples
of best practice in other standards. Could you help with that?
Best,
martin
Nicholas Crofts wrote:
Dear all,
A first reactions to Martin's draft :
This is definitely a step forward but it still needs a lot of work to
turn in into a praticable approach. Considered as a definition of the
different aspects of "CRM compatibility", it does help to clarify some
important issues. Considered as method for establishing compatibilty, it
falls a long way short. The final phrase "The provider or a third party
should be able to verify and demonstrate the claim by suitable test
data." sums it up... what counts as a suitable test and who would be a
relevant third party?
Looking forward to seeing you in Athens
Nick
nicholas crofts consulting
cultural information management
gestion de l'information culturelle
av. miremont 23c
ch-1206 genève
+41 22 557 90 92
[email protected]
www.crofts.ch <http://www.crofts.ch/>
Don't miss CIDOC 2008 _www.cidoc2008.gr <http://www.cidoc2008.gr/>_
--- On *Tue, 2/9/08, martin /<[email protected]>/* wrote:
From: martin <[email protected]>
Subject: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: CRM compatibility, VERY IMPORTANT
To: "crm-sig" <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, 2 September, 2008, 4:42 PM
Dear All,
Attached my draft trying to flesh out in a text form the decisions made
about CRM comaptibility in the last CRM-SIG meeting in May. This should
become
the instrument to distinguish false compatibility claims. It should be
rich enough to cover all reasonable application cases. If not, we have to
change
it.
Please read carefully, with respect to:
a) Is this clear enough so that a good practice of validating CRM
compatibility
can be based on this
b) Is it logically consistent
c) Is it good English
d) Is it functional and useful, is it attractive for providers and users,
does it foster what we want to achieve with the CRM?
Please comment. This text, your comments or rewritings will be the base for
a
decision on the CIDOC Conference if this text will be proposed to ISO
as amendment to ISO21127. Only proposals submitted to this mailing list
before the meeting will be discussed.
Best,
Martin
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Principle Researcher | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: [email protected] |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Principle Researcher | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: [email protected] |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
Vassilika Vouton,P.O.Box1385,GR71110 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
