Dear Christian-Emil Ore,
Dear all,

those of use that attended the CIDOC2008 Conference in Athens this September 
already know that Prof. Görz made a presentation of an owl-dl implememation of 
the CRM. We also used this implemenation in our workshop "Museum documentation 
in transdisciplinary perspective" 
(http://www.cidoc2008.gr/cidoc/site/Home/t_docpage?doc=/Documents/conference/museum-documentation-in-transdisciplinary-perspective).
 For this purposes there was a need to have a slick namespace as it is needed 
for all owl-ontologies. So I registered the domain "cidoc-crm.org". The idea 
was to forward all requests to "http://www.cidoc-crm.org"; to the crm-website at 
ICS-FORTH, whereas the subdirectory "owl" should point to the mentioned 
owl-implementation. That would have allowed to generate a namespace like 
"http://www.cidoc-crm.org/owl/2008/09/01/cidoc-crm-4.2.4.owl#";.

I apologize for not thinking twice about possible conflicts with the interests 
of the CRM-SIG itself and for some misunderstanding we may have caused. In 
Athens there was a discussion to give the CRM a new domain due to its 
increasing popularity. As "cidoc-crm.org" would be a perfect domain for the CRM 
(and the SIG) i would like to transfer this domain - if needed - to an 
institution that is related to the SIG. Maybe the CIDOC itself should host and 
own this domain.

Nevertheless it would be nice if a new website for the CRM would have more 
collaboration functionalities and a place for - let's call it 
"third-party-products" -, where partitioners could maintain information about 
what they provide and keep it up-to-date by themselfs, of course always in 
consultation with the SIG.

Best,
Georg Hohmann
--
Germanisches Nationalmuseum
Department of Museum Informatics
Kartäusergasse 1
D-90402 Nürnberg
Tel +49-911-1331 289
Fax +49-911-1331 193
www.gnm.de

Reply via email to