martin wrote: > Sean Gillies wrote: >> I'm not seeing any licensing information in the CIDOC-CRM RDFS or OWL >> docs, or in the defining document. What are the relevant licenses or >> terms of use? >> >> Regards, >> Sean >> >> -- >> Sean Gillies >> Institute for the Study of the Ancient World >> New York University >> _______________________________________________ >> Crm-sig mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig >> > There is no licensing, just normal copyright of the docs. > Note that the standard is defined as text. Currently, > there is no authoritative OWL or RDFS implementation. We hope to have > one in a few > weeks from now. > > If you have any further question, please do not hesitate to contact us. > > Best, > > Martin >
All rights reserved, then? Unlike the BIBO and FRBR ontologies which have CC-BY licenses? I'm asking just to be clear, not to start a religious war over licensing. Sean
