Your suggestion "measured as part of the sale event" means the sale is both E8 Acquisition and E16 Measurement. So instead of using a custom subProperty "rso:P43_has_dimension": <obj/2926> crm:P24i_changed_ownership_through <obj/2926/acquisition/1>. <obj/2926/acquisition/1> rso:P43_has_dimension <obj/2926/acquisition/1/price>.
I should say the sale "observed_dimension" instead of "has_dimension": <obj/2926> crm:P24i_changed_ownership_through <obj/2926/acquisition/1>. <obj/2926> crm:P39i_was_measured_by <obj/2926/acquisition/1>. <obj/2926/acquisition/1> crm:P40_observed_dimension <obj/2926/acquisition/1/price>. Stephen, thanks for your feedback! I've fixed our mapping. -- >> "Susanna Bathing" by Rembrandt was sold in 1758 by Snijers to Fierens on auction >> for the *amount of 157 HFL (Holland Florins)*. > not the event that has the dimension but the object: It has a value measured > as part of the sale event. I forgot the most direct observation: 157 HFL is *not* the price of Susanna now (it's probably priceless, and HFL doesn't even exist anymore as a currency). Looking again at http://personal.sirma.bg/vladimir/crm-graphical/#measurement, this means the long-cut P39,P40 does *not* imply the shortcut P43. Every re-valuation (or sale) should be accumulated as E16 Measurement, but P43 "should" be overwritten with the most current Dimension resulting from that measurement, since P43 is not historic. I still think the examples I gave (esp from the domain of Physics and Chemistry) have merit. >> 18] how do you explain this: "P39 measured" points to E1, "P43 >> has dimension" is a shortcut thereof, but P43 points lower than E1. > P43 represents the common shortcut observed in existing documentation systems > that measure particular Things So P43 is intended for a commonly observed situation, while its longcut P39 is intended for an uncommon situation? You can Measure anything (even events), but you cannot state the resulting Dimension directly? I think that judging commonality is subjective business, so this is a shaky cognitive ground...
