Hello all, It's my first post to CRM-SIG so please go easy on me...
I am looking at the feasibility (semantically and technically) of mapping IPTC Core & Extension, PLUS fields and XMP (produced by commercial companies) to the LIDO format (www.lido-schema.org/<http://www.lido-schema.org/>). As a first step I wondered if anyone had done the exercise of mapping to CIDOC-CRM to demonstrate a basic level of compatibility? I am thinking the use cases in various types of commercial organisation are quite different, even before considering the needs of cultural heritage, but I hypothesise there may be some way to specify how a generic heritage viewpoint might be served by these fields and create "good enough" mappings. Any leads will be gratefully accepted and acknowledged. Best wishes, Michael Hopwood Linked Heritage Project Lead EDItEUR United House, North Road London N7 9DP UK Tel: +44 20 7503 6418 Mob: +44 7811 591036 Skype: michael.hopwood.editeur http://www.linkedheritage.org/ http://editeur.org/ The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee only. If you are not the intended recipient, please inform the sender and delete this e-mail immediately. The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent. We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses, so please scan all attachments. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the company. EDItEUR Limited is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England no 2994705. Registered Office: 2 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3ST.
