I think that P55 should have the same domain as P53 (E18 Physical Thing), and not a more specific class. - Currently you can say "E18 Physical Thing. P53 has former or current location" but not "E18 Physical Thing. P55 has current location". - Looking at the class diagram, P55 excludes: Physical Feature, Site, Man-Made Feature, Man-Made Thing, Collection. What is the justification?
- Re: [Crm-sig] Location of inscription martin
- [Crm-sig] ISSUE: P55 should have domain E18 Physical... Vladimir Alexiev
- Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: P55 should have domain E18 ... martin
- Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: P55 should have domain ... Vladimir Alexiev
- Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: P55 should have dom... martin
- Re: [Crm-sig] ISSUE: P55 should hav... Vladimir Alexiev
- [Crm-sig] Location of inscription Vladimir Alexiev
