Given that P106_is_composed_of and P148_has_component (and their inverses) are transitive, shouldn't P9_consists_of and P46_is_composed_of (and their inverses) also be transitive? Isn't this an inconsistency in ECRM?
Non-transitive variants are useful to analyze the immediate parts, and this can be obtained by asking an RDF repository to return explicit (not inferred) facts.
