Hi Georg Many thanks for your response on this-was very helpful. I shall use Vladimir's extension in our own mapping!
Cheers Josh On 29 Mar 2012, at 13:26, "Hohmann, Georg" <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > this approach was originated by Bernhard Schiemann of the Erlangen CRM Team > and has been discussed in May 2009 (see > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/pipermail/crm-sig/2009-May/001355.html). The > attachment of this mail is also available at > http://erlangen-crm.org/documentation ("Proposal of a E52 Time-Span > extension"). > > In 2009 we implemented this proposal as an "add-on" to the ECRM, which is > still available at http://erlangen-crm.org/onto/addons/ecrm-tq_091202.owl . > Later (in 2010) we decided to strip this add-on and leave it to the users to > extend the ECRM in the way they need it. Since it is "best practice" to > extend an ontology by creating subclasses and -properties, Vladimirs approach > seems to me a good way to add P81a and P82a to the recent version of the ECRM. > > Best regards > Georg > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] Im > Auftrag von Vladimir Alexiev > Gesendet: Montag, 26. März 2012 17:53 > An: 'Joshan Mahmud'; [email protected] > Betreff: Re: [Crm-sig] CRM Time > >> P81a/b and P82a/b > > I made this in Nov 2011, see attached. It's for ECRM. > Compared to Martin's proposal, I use long prop names, e.g. > P81a_end_of_the_begin > > Cheers! V > > _______________________________________________ > Crm-sig mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
