> As you know we do/try not to add classes to the model unless it forms an > anchor for some properties or is structurally necessary. > So what are the new properties that justify the proposed new sub-class?
Pxx_has_found: domain: Exx Discovery range: E77 Persistent Item subprop of: P12i_was_present_at Pyy_found: domain: Exx Discovery range: E39 Actor subprop of: P14_carried_out_by In case you object that one could simply use P12i and P14, please note that exactly the same pattern is used e.g. for the four class-specific subprops of P1: P78, P87, P102, P131 > The alternative is just to type an instance of E7 Activity. CRM does not (and I guess never will) standardize P2_has_type values. I think it's appropriate to standardize this concept that is important in the domain addressed by CRM (archaeology) and for FR search. Best regards! V
