Hi Vladimir,

On 11/10/2013 12:48 μμ, Vladimir Alexiev wrote:
The case that Dan describes is modeled quite often in IT: in any business 
system that deals with staff.

Not really. President of the United States is not a job description.
It is standardly modeled as a Position, being an association between Person and 
Organization; and having a Role, duration, etc.

CERIF generalizes this greatly, by modeling associations between any two core 
entities in a generic way.
They use this to describe e.g. departments (Org-Org),
positions, temporary assignments (Person-Org),
boss, supervisor, reporting lines, collaborators (Person-Person),
project leaders, staff, reviewers (Person-Project),
etc etc.

IMHO the modeling of Position as a group (singleton at any given time) is 
neither straightforward nor completely adequate.

I did not say that a "position" is a "group". That's a misunderstanding. I spoke about "official positions which used to be regarded in certain contexts as one actor, independent of the current holder of the office." in one of my last e-mails.

What you describe above is modelled in the CRM exactly in the same way as you refer to about CERIF:

P107 has current or former member (is current or former member of): E39 Actor
                (P107.1 kind of member: E55 Type)




I said an "office" is a group. That's a different thing.

E.g. how do you:

- record that Obama acted in his capacity of US President?

If this is not explicit, he can be in legal trouble!
Indeed some office carriers do not understand the difference, but that is another issue...Imagine Obama buys a car for his daughter and signs as The President!

This is a legal question. The reason to regard an office of this type as a group, and not as a "persona" was that

1) acting in the capacity of the office is distinct from acting as a private person in the sense of law. This is evident in signatures, press conferences, speeches and roles in representation of the state or what the office represents.

2) The decisions and other relationships to the "official" acts of the office carrier persist independent from the carrier for this office.

Therefore, the office as such, and not its carriers, represents a legal persistent entity with the capacity of acting intentionally as one individual. This conforms with the definition of a Group. If an office is not defined in that way, it's just a job position.

(The persona, for Swiss psychologist Carl Jung, was the social face the individual presented to the world—"a kind of mask, designed on the one hand to make a definite impression upon others, and on the other to conceal the true nature of the individual. Wikipedia)

Best,

Martin

- connect the US to the position of US President?


_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig



--

--------------------------------------------------------------
 Dr. Martin Doerr              |  Vox:+30(2810)391625        |
 Research Director             |  Fax:+30(2810)391638        |
                               |  Email: [email protected] |
                                                             |
               Center for Cultural Informatics               |
               Information Systems Laboratory                |
                Institute of Computer Science                |
   Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH)   |
                                                             |
               N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton,             |
                GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece               |
                                                             |
             Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl           |
--------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to