Hi! I have some suggestions for fixes to the CRM 5.1 RDFS representation: - crm:P150_defines_typical_parts_of: -- Scope note describes 'The property \"broaderPartitive\"' (should describe P150). -- Talks of 'broaderPartitive in SKOS' but there is no such in SKOS. There is iso-thes:broaderPartitive (defined in ISO 25964). -- Says 'typically form part' but ISO defines BTP as 'necessary part' (eg 'car wheels BTP cars' but not 'wheels BTP cars'). I dont' have access to the standard, but here's what Jutta Lindenthal (member of the ISO WG) wrote: "The hierarchical whole-part-relationship covers a limited range of situations in which a part of an entity or system belongs uniquely to a particular possessing whole in any context; or in other words, the part may not belong to more than one whole, and it has to be universally valid". Ref: ISO 25964-1:2011, 10.2.3.1 -- If you define a property that is analog of broaderPartitive, shouldn't you also define analogs of broaderGeneric and broaderInstantial? These are the 3 varietes of broader defined by ISO. - crm:P152_has_parent: scope note is copied from P151 and contradicts domain & range.
Cheers! Vladimir
