Good issue!
The question is, if we regard that a physical feature such as a rock
side carries an inscription,
or that the physical inscription, which is a man-made feature, carries
the inscription, and is part
of the rock side. The first case would be a shortcut of the latter. I'd
vote for the relaxed form, which allows for saying both.
If the rock would be a man-made wall, we would not forced to create the
physical inscription intermediate, because the constraint to man-made
would already be full-filled.
This would create an assymetry in interpretation.
Best,
Martin
On 22/9/2014 4:18 μμ, Ceri Binding wrote:
Dear all,
In both the official version (5.0.4) and the latest draft version (5.1.2) of the
reference document on the CIDOC CRM website the scope note for E84 Information Carrier
states that "the property P128 carries (is carried by) applies to E18 Physical Thing
in general". However the domain of P128 is currently E24 Physical Man-Made Thing.
Should the scope note for E84 be changed to say that P128 applies to E24, or should the
domain of P128 be changed to E18?
Best regards,
Ceri
_______________________________________________
Crm-sig mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ics.forth.gr/mailman/listinfo/crm-sig
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Martin Doerr | Vox:+30(2810)391625 |
Research Director | Fax:+30(2810)391638 |
| Email: [email protected] |
|
Center for Cultural Informatics |
Information Systems Laboratory |
Institute of Computer Science |
Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas (FORTH) |
|
N.Plastira 100, Vassilika Vouton, |
GR70013 Heraklion,Crete,Greece |
|
Web-site: http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl |
--------------------------------------------------------------
