Hi everyone (and Happy New Year !)
I ask again for advice... How to express (elegantly) a disjunction between two properties ? Context: Case 1: In less than two weeks I came across two paintings (one in Bucharest and one in Baltimore) having alternative authorship (not in the sense of "controversial" attribution). The Baltimore one is: http://art.thewalters.org/detail/29205/massacre-of-the-innocents/ The label on the Walters Museum wall reads: Bartolo di Fredi or Andrea di Bartolo (son) The description ("...The Massacre of the Innocents might have been executed by both Bartolo and Andrea (active 1389-1428), working collaboratively as a father and son team....") indicates that we have here an inclusive OR. Note: an art historian tells me that there are a lot of such cases ! Case 2: An alternative dating, e.g. Tiziano VECELLIO, dit TITIEN (Pieve di Cadore, 1488/1490 - Venise, 1576) For the moment, I have only a "brute force" solution (sorry for the lack of rigour): Case 1: <id0> <[E22] The Massacre of the Innocents> < crm:P108i_was_produced_by> <[E12] id-creation> <id1> <[E12] id-creation> <crm:P11_had_participant> <[E21] Bartolo> <id2> <[E12] id-creation> <crm:P11_had_participant> <[E21] Andrea di Bartolo> <id3> <id1> <inclusiveOr> <id2> NB. I could handle the controversial attributions in a similar way. Since each of my statements is linked to its provenance, i.e. to a crm:E13_Attribute Assignment, each alternative attribution is linked to a different E13. Case 2: <id4> <[E21] Tiziano> <crm:P98i was_born> <[E67] id-birth> <id5> <[E67] id-birth> <crm:P4_has_time-span> <[E52] 1488> <id6> <[E67] id-birth> <crm:P4_has_time-span> <[E52] 1490> <id7> <id5> <exclusiveOr> <id6> It is possible to avoid <inclusiveOr> and <exclusiveOr> ? (I'm not too happy with this solution.) Thanks, Dan
