Dear all,

In the course of our project that aims to replace our current information 
system by a new one built on an object-oriented model, we tried to verify the 
compatibility of the document Records in Contexts (RiC) with the CIDOC-CRM 
ontology, although we are aware that the document released by the EGAD group 
last September is still a consultation draft.

So far we could model almost every item of RiC using CIDOC-CRM with a few 
exceptions. One of them is the concept of "Media Type", defined as a "property 
of a record", as follows:

RiC-P12 Media Type:  The general type of intermediation device required to 
render the content of a Record.
Data Type: Controlled Term
Examples: audio; computer; microform; unmediated; video

Another is the pair of concepts "predecessor/successor", present in the listing 
of possible relations between "Records"(RiC-E1) , "Record Components" (RiC-E2), 
"Record Sets" (RiC-E3), "Agents"(RiC-E4), "Occupations"(RiC-E5), 
"Positions"(RiC-E-6), "Functions" (RiC-E7), "Activities" (RiC-E9) and 
"Mandates"(RiC-E10).

Any ideas how to represent these concepts with CIDOC-CRM...?

Best regards,


Maria José de Almeida
Técnico Superior / DSIAE

[Logo_DGLAB-2015-2016-MC-EMAIL]

Reply via email to